Members of the Supreme Court in a group photo in April. Seated from left are Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left are Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Elena Kagan, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett. | Erin Schaff / The New York Times via AP

Their record on the hot-button issue might offer clues on how they’ll vote months from now when they decide whether to reverse decisions going back nearly 50 years.

WASHINGTON — Abortion already is dominating the Supreme Court’s new term, months before the justices will weigh in on the future of abortion rights in the United States, deciding whether to reverse decisions going back nearly 50 years.

Not only is there Mississippi’s call to overrule Roe v. Wade, but the court also soon will be asked again to weigh in on the Texas law banning abortion at roughly six weeks.

The justices have had a lot to say about abortion over the years — in opinions, votes, Senate confirmation testimony and elsewhere. Here is a sampling:

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS

Roberts voted to uphold restrictions in two major abortion cases, in the majority in 2007 to uphold a ban on a method of abortion opponents call “partial-birth abortion” and in dissent in 2016 when the court struck down Texas restrictions on abortion clinics in a case called Whole Woman’s Health.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.

But when a virtually identical law from Louisiana came before the court in 2020, Roberts voted against it and wrote the opinion striking down the Louisiana law. The chief justice said he continues to believe that the 2016 case “was wrongly decided” but that the question was “whether to adhere to it in deciding the present case.”

Roberts’ views on when to break with court precedent could determine how far he is willing to go in the Mississippi case. At his 2005 confirmation hearing, he said overturning precedent “is a jolt to the legal system.”

Thinking an earlier case was wrongly decided isn’t enough, he said. Overturning a case requires looking “at these other factors, like settled expectations, like the legitimacy of the court, like whether a particular precedent is workable or not, whether a precedent has been eroded by subsequent developments,” Roberts said then.

JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS

Thomas voted to overturn Roe in 1992 during his first term on the court, when he was a dissenter in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. He has repeatedly called for Roe and Casey to be overturned since.

In 2000, he wrote in dissent when the court struck down Nebraska’s ban on “partial-birth abortion.”

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Recounting the court’s decision in Roe, he wrote, “In 1973, this Court struck down an Act of the Texas Legislature that had been in effect since 1857, thereby rendering unconstitutional abortion statutes in dozens of States. As some of my colleagues on the Court, past and present, ably demonstrated, that decision was grievously wrong. Abortion is a unique act, in which a woman’s exercise of control over her own body ends, depending on one’s view, human life or potential human life. Nothing in our Federal Constitution deprives the people of this country of the right to determine whether the consequences of abortion to the fetus and to society outweigh the burden of an unwanted pregnancy on the mother. Although a State may permit abortion, nothing in the Constitution dictates that a State must do so.”

JUSTICE STEPHEN BREYER

Breyer has been the lead author of two majority opinions in defense of abortion rights, in 2000 and 2016. He has never voted to sustain an abortion restriction.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.

Millions of Americans believe “that an abortion is akin to causing the death of an innocent child,” while millions of others “fear that a law that forbids abortion would condemn many American women to lives that lack dignity,” he wrote in the Nebraska case 21 years ago, calling those views “virtually irreconcilable.”

Still, Breyer wrote, because the Constitution guarantees “fundamental individual liberty” and has to govern even when there are strong divisions in the country, “this Court, in the course of a generation, has determined and then redetermined that the Constitution offers basic protection to the woman’s right to choose.”

JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO

Alito has a long record of votes and writings opposing abortion rights, as a jurist and, earlier, a government lawyer.

Alito has voted to uphold every abortion law the court has considered since his 2006 confirmation, joining a majority to uphold the federal “partial-birth” abortion law and dissenting in the 2016 and 2020 cases.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

As a federal appeals court judge, he voted to uphold a series of Pennsylvania abortion restrictions, including requiring a woman to notify her spouse before obtaining an abortion. The Supreme Court ultimately struck down the notification rule in Casey and reaffirmed the abortion right in 1992 by a 5-4 vote.

While working for the Reagan administration in 1985, Alito wrote in a memo that the government should say publicly in a pending abortion case “that we disagree with Roe v. Wade.”

Around the same time, applying for a promotion, Alito noted he was “particularly proud” of his work arguing “that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion.”

JUSTICE SONIA SOTOMAYOR

Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 with virtually no record on abortion issues, has voted repeatedly in favor of abortion rights since then.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Recently, when the court allowed Texas’ restrictive abortion law to take effect, Sotomayor accused her colleagues of burying “their heads in the sand.”

She was in the majority in the Texas and Louisiana abortion clinic cases.

Sotomayor’s displeasure with the recent Texas ruling was evident at a recent virtual appearance she made.

“I can’t change Texas’ law, but you can,” she said.

JUSTICE ELENA KAGAN

Kagan has repeatedly voted in favor of abortion rights in more than 11 years as a justice.

She also is arguably the most consistent voice on the court arguing for the importance of adhering to precedents and can be expected to try to persuade her colleagues not to jettison constitutional protections for abortion.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.

Kagan was in the majority when the court struck down the Texas and Louisiana restrictions on abortion clinics. More recently, Kagan called Texas’ new abortion law “patently unconstitutional” and a “clear, and indeed undisputed, conflict with Roe and Casey.”

While working in the Clinton White House, she was the co-author of a memo urging the president for political reasons to support a late-term abortion ban proposed by Republicans in Congress as long as it contained an exception for the health of the woman. Ultimately, President George W. Bush signed a similar late-term abortion ban without a health exception. The Supreme Court upheld it.

JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH

Gorsuch was in the majority allowing Texas’ restrictive abortion law to take effect. In dissent in 2020, he would have upheld Louisiana’s abortion clinic restrictions.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

As an appeals court judge before joining the Supreme Court in 2017, Gorsuch dissented when his colleagues declined to reconsider a ruling that blocked then-Utah Gov. Gary Herbert from cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood.

But, at his Senate confirmation hearing, Gorsuch said he was concerned only then about procedural issues: “I do not care if the case is about abortion or widgets or anything else.”

JUSTICE BRETT KAVANAUGH

Kavanaugh’s name was added to former President Donald Trump’s shortlist of Supreme Court candidates shortly after he sided with the administration in a 2017 case involving abortion. Trump chose him for the court the following year.

As a justice, Kavanaugh dissented from the Louisiana decision and voted to allow the new Texas law to take effect, though he has taken a less absolutist stance than some of his conservative colleagues.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

In the Louisiana case, Kavanaugh wrote that more information was needed about how the restrictions on clinics would affect doctors who provide abortions and seemed to suggest his vote could change based on that information.

Kavanaugh’s most extensive writing on abortion came while a judge on the federal appeals court in Washington. The Trump administration had appealed a ruling ordering it to allow a pregnant 17-year-old immigrant in its custody to get an abortion. The administration’s policy was to decline to help those minors get abortions while in custody.

Kavanaugh was on a three-judge panel that postponed the abortion, arguing that officials should be given a limited window to transfer the minor from government custody to the care of a sponsor. She could then obtain an abortion without government assistance.

The full appeals court later reversed the decision, and the teenager got an abortion.

Kavanaugh called that decision out of step with “many majority opinions of the Supreme Court that have repeatedly upheld reasonable regulations that do not impose an undue burden on the abortion right recognized by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade.”

At his appeals court confirmation hearing, Kavanaugh dodged questions on his views on Roe v. Wade.

JUSTICE AMY CONEY BARRETT

Barrett’s one public Supreme Court vote on abortion was to allow the Texas “fetal heartbeat” law to take effect. She also cast two votes as an appeals court judge to reconsider rulings that blocked Indiana abortion restrictions.

In 2016, shortly before the election that put Trump in office, she commented about how she thought abortion law might change if Trump had the chance to appoint justices.

Getty Images
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

“I … don’t think the core case — Roe’s core holding that, you know, women have a right to an abortion — I don’t think that would change,” said Barrett, then a Notre Dame law professor.

She said limits on what she called “very late-term abortions” and restrictions on abortion clinics would be more likely to be upheld.

Barrett also has a record of personal opposition to abortion rights, co-authoring a 1998 law review article that said abortion is “always immoral.”

But at her 2017 hearing to be an appeals court judge, Barrett said in written testimony, “If I am confirmed, my views on this or any other question will have no bearing on the discharge of my duties as a judge.”

Read More

Leave a Reply